2013
Blanch C, Fernández E, Martínez-Sánchez JM, Ariza C, López MJ, Moncada A, Schiaffino A, Rajmil L, Saltó E, Pascual JA, Nebot M, research RESPIR·NET group.
Prev Med. 2013;57:585–590.
Resumen | Enlaces | BibTeX | Etiquetas:
@article{pmid23933268,
title = {Impact of a multi-level intervention to prevent secondhand smoke exposure in schoolchildren: a randomized cluster community trial},
author = {Blanch C and Fernández E and Martínez-Sánchez JM and Ariza C and López MJ and Moncada A and Schiaffino A and Rajmil L and Saltó E and Pascual JA and Nebot M and RESPIR·NET research group},
doi = {10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.07.018},
issn = {1096-0260},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-11-01},
journal = {Prev Med},
volume = {57},
number = {5},
pages = {585--590},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a multi-level (individual, family, and school) school-based intervention to prevent the exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) in a population of schoolchildren (12-14 years old).nnMETHOD: This was a community trial with cluster randomization of schools to an intervention and comparison group (ClinicalTrials.Gov identifier NCT01881607). The intervention targeted schoolchildren in Terrassa (Catalonia, Spain). We assessed SHS exposure in different settings and tobacco consumption by means of a questionnaire before and one year after the intervention.nnRESULTS: We analyzed data from 1734 students with both baseline and follow-up data. The crude analysis showed that SHS exposure among students in the intervention group significantly decreased at school (-14.0%), at home (-19.9%), and on transportation (-21.8%). In the comparison group, SHS exposure significantly decreased only at home (-16.9%). After adjustment for potential confounders, the good accomplishment of the activities showed a possible trend towards a non-significant reduction in exposure at home, transportation, and leisure time.nnCONCLUSION: While this school-based multi-level intervention had no overall effect in SHS exposure, the improvement of the activities focused on preventing SHS would be needed in order to achieve a significant decrease in the proportion of children exposed to SHS.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a multi-level (individual, family, and school) school-based intervention to prevent the exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) in a population of schoolchildren (12-14 years old).nnMETHOD: This was a community trial with cluster randomization of schools to an intervention and comparison group (ClinicalTrials.Gov identifier NCT01881607). The intervention targeted schoolchildren in Terrassa (Catalonia, Spain). We assessed SHS exposure in different settings and tobacco consumption by means of a questionnaire before and one year after the intervention.nnRESULTS: We analyzed data from 1734 students with both baseline and follow-up data. The crude analysis showed that SHS exposure among students in the intervention group significantly decreased at school (-14.0%), at home (-19.9%), and on transportation (-21.8%). In the comparison group, SHS exposure significantly decreased only at home (-16.9%). After adjustment for potential confounders, the good accomplishment of the activities showed a possible trend towards a non-significant reduction in exposure at home, transportation, and leisure time.nnCONCLUSION: While this school-based multi-level intervention had no overall effect in SHS exposure, the improvement of the activities focused on preventing SHS would be needed in order to achieve a significant decrease in the proportion of children exposed to SHS.
Fu M, Martínez-Sánchez JM, Sureda X, Martínez C, Ballbè M, Baranda L, Riccobene A, Fernández E.
2013, ISSN: 1573-7284.
@misc{pmid23903959,
title = {Handwritten versus scanned signature on the invitation letter: does it make any difference in participation in a population-based study?},
author = {Fu M and Martínez-Sánchez JM and Sureda X and Martínez C and Ballbè M and Baranda L and Riccobene A and Fernández E},
doi = {10.1007/s10654-013-9838-3},
issn = {1573-7284},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-11-01},
journal = {Eur J Epidemiol},
volume = {28},
number = {11},
pages = {931--934},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
Martín-Pujol A, Fernández E, Schiaffino A, Moncada A, Ariza C, Blanch C, Martínez-Sánchez JM, research RESPIR·NET group.
Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:e305–e309.
Resumen | Enlaces | BibTeX | Etiquetas:
@article{pmid23581609,
title = {Tobacco smoking, exposure to second-hand smoke, and asthma and wheezing in schoolchildren: a cross-sectional study},
author = {Martín-Pujol A and Fernández E and Schiaffino A and Moncada A and Ariza C and Blanch C and Martínez-Sánchez JM and RESPIR·NET research group},
doi = {10.1111/apa.12232},
issn = {1651-2227},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-07-01},
journal = {Acta Paediatr},
volume = {102},
number = {7},
pages = {e305--e309},
abstract = {AIM: To analyse the association between tobacco smoking, exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) and reports of wheezing and asthma in a sample of schoolchildren.nnMETHODS: A structured questionnaire was administered to 1766 students (7th grade, aged 12-13 years) at 25 schools in Terrassa, Spain (2006). We determined the prevalence of active smoking, exposure to SHS and reports of wheezing and asthma, and their association by means of prevalence odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).nnRESULTS: 97.5% of children were nonsmokers, 1.5% were experimental smokers and 1% were regular smokers. 41.1% of children reported exposure to SHS at home, 40.0% at school, 53.9% in their leisure time and 33.2% while using private or public transportation. Wheezing was reported by 9.2% of children, and 9.2% reported asthma. A significant association was found between smoking tobacco and wheezing: OR in experimental smokers = 3.0 (95% CI 1.2-7.7), and OR in active smokers = 4.2 (95% CI 1.4-12.5). Exposure to SHS while using transportation was associated with wheezing (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.0-2.0). Tobacco smoking and exposure to SHS were not associated with asthma.nnCONCLUSION: Active and experimental smokers, and those who reported exposure to SHS while using public or private transportation, had higher likelihood of reporting wheezing. No association between active or passive smoking and asthma was observed.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
AIM: To analyse the association between tobacco smoking, exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) and reports of wheezing and asthma in a sample of schoolchildren.nnMETHODS: A structured questionnaire was administered to 1766 students (7th grade, aged 12-13 years) at 25 schools in Terrassa, Spain (2006). We determined the prevalence of active smoking, exposure to SHS and reports of wheezing and asthma, and their association by means of prevalence odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).nnRESULTS: 97.5% of children were nonsmokers, 1.5% were experimental smokers and 1% were regular smokers. 41.1% of children reported exposure to SHS at home, 40.0% at school, 53.9% in their leisure time and 33.2% while using private or public transportation. Wheezing was reported by 9.2% of children, and 9.2% reported asthma. A significant association was found between smoking tobacco and wheezing: OR in experimental smokers = 3.0 (95% CI 1.2-7.7), and OR in active smokers = 4.2 (95% CI 1.4-12.5). Exposure to SHS while using transportation was associated with wheezing (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.0-2.0). Tobacco smoking and exposure to SHS were not associated with asthma.nnCONCLUSION: Active and experimental smokers, and those who reported exposure to SHS while using public or private transportation, had higher likelihood of reporting wheezing. No association between active or passive smoking and asthma was observed.
Porta M, Vandenbroucke JP, Ioannidis JP, Sanz S, Fernandez E, Bhopal R, Morabia A, Victora C, Lopez T.
Trends in citations to books on epidemiological and statistical methods in the biomedical literature. Artículo
PLoS One. 2013;8:e61837.
Resumen | Enlaces | BibTeX | Etiquetas:
@article{pmid23667447,
title = {Trends in citations to books on epidemiological and statistical methods in the biomedical literature},
author = {Porta M and Vandenbroucke JP and Ioannidis JP and Sanz S and Fernandez E and Bhopal R and Morabia A and Victora C and Lopez T},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0061837},
issn = {1932-6203},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {PLoS One},
volume = {8},
number = {5},
pages = {e61837},
abstract = {BACKGROUND: There are no analyses of citations to books on epidemiological and statistical methods in the biomedical literature. Such analyses may shed light on how concepts and methods changed while biomedical research evolved. Our aim was to analyze the number and time trends of citations received from biomedical articles by books on epidemiological and statistical methods, and related disciplines.nnMETHODS AND FINDINGS: The data source was the Web of Science. The study books were published between 1957 and 2010. The first year of publication of the citing articles was 1945. We identified 125 books that received at least 25 citations. Books first published in 1980-1989 had the highest total and median number of citations per year. Nine of the 10 most cited texts focused on statistical methods. Hosmer & Lemeshow's Applied logistic regression received the highest number of citations and highest average annual rate. It was followed by books by Fleiss, Armitage, et al., Rothman, et al., and Kalbfleisch and Prentice. Fifth in citations per year was Sackett, et al., Evidence-based medicine. The rise of multivariate methods, clinical epidemiology, or nutritional epidemiology was reflected in the citation trends. Educational textbooks, practice-oriented books, books on epidemiological substantive knowledge, and on theory and health policies were much less cited. None of the 25 top-cited books had the theoretical or sociopolitical scope of works by Cochrane, McKeown, Rose, or Morris.nnCONCLUSIONS: Books were mainly cited to reference methods. Books first published in the 1980s continue to be most influential. Older books on theory and policies were rooted in societal and general medical concerns, while the most modern books are almost purely on methods.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
BACKGROUND: There are no analyses of citations to books on epidemiological and statistical methods in the biomedical literature. Such analyses may shed light on how concepts and methods changed while biomedical research evolved. Our aim was to analyze the number and time trends of citations received from biomedical articles by books on epidemiological and statistical methods, and related disciplines.nnMETHODS AND FINDINGS: The data source was the Web of Science. The study books were published between 1957 and 2010. The first year of publication of the citing articles was 1945. We identified 125 books that received at least 25 citations. Books first published in 1980-1989 had the highest total and median number of citations per year. Nine of the 10 most cited texts focused on statistical methods. Hosmer & Lemeshow's Applied logistic regression received the highest number of citations and highest average annual rate. It was followed by books by Fleiss, Armitage, et al., Rothman, et al., and Kalbfleisch and Prentice. Fifth in citations per year was Sackett, et al., Evidence-based medicine. The rise of multivariate methods, clinical epidemiology, or nutritional epidemiology was reflected in the citation trends. Educational textbooks, practice-oriented books, books on epidemiological substantive knowledge, and on theory and health policies were much less cited. None of the 25 top-cited books had the theoretical or sociopolitical scope of works by Cochrane, McKeown, Rose, or Morris.nnCONCLUSIONS: Books were mainly cited to reference methods. Books first published in the 1980s continue to be most influential. Older books on theory and policies were rooted in societal and general medical concerns, while the most modern books are almost purely on methods.
Martínez-Sánchez JM, Fu M, Gallus S, Sureda X, La Vecchia C, Fernández E.
[Variability in cigarette consumption according to the data source in Spain (1993-2009)]. Artículo
Gac Sanit. 2013;27:61–63.
Resumen | Enlaces | BibTeX | Etiquetas:
@article{pmid22695369,
title = {[Variability in cigarette consumption according to the data source in Spain (1993-2009)]},
author = {Martínez-Sánchez JM and Fu M and Gallus S and Sureda X and La Vecchia C and Fernández E},
doi = {10.1016/j.gaceta.2012.05.003},
issn = {1578-1283},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Gac Sanit},
volume = {27},
number = {1},
pages = {61--63},
abstract = {OBJECTIVES: To assess the variability in the number of cigarettes smoked per person per day in Spain according to the information source (health surveys versus legal sales).nnMETHODS: We compared cigarette consumption per person per day (population aged ≥16 years) obtained from the national health surveys in Spain and the official data on legal tobacco sales between 1993 and 2009.nnRESULTS: Cigarette consumption per person per day decreased between 1993 and 2009. Over the entire period, the number of cigarettes smoked per person per day according to legal sales exceeded that reported by national health surveys (up to 46.9%).nnCONCLUSION: The difference in data on the number of cigarettes smoked between national health surveys and legal sales has increased in the last few years in Spain.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
OBJECTIVES: To assess the variability in the number of cigarettes smoked per person per day in Spain according to the information source (health surveys versus legal sales).nnMETHODS: We compared cigarette consumption per person per day (population aged ≥16 years) obtained from the national health surveys in Spain and the official data on legal tobacco sales between 1993 and 2009.nnRESULTS: Cigarette consumption per person per day decreased between 1993 and 2009. Over the entire period, the number of cigarettes smoked per person per day according to legal sales exceeded that reported by national health surveys (up to 46.9%).nnCONCLUSION: The difference in data on the number of cigarettes smoked between national health surveys and legal sales has increased in the last few years in Spain.